Search for: "SECURITY INS. CO. v. DEAL" Results 121 - 140 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Following a nonjury trial, Supreme Court, as relevant to this appeal, awarded plaintiff maintenance of $1,000 per month until she was eligible for Social Security retirement benefits in January 2022, subject to earlier termination upon various conditions, including if she remarries or the commencement of her receipt of her share of defendant's pension. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
YAM also argued that ING had failed to show that it was damaged by any breach because it had provided no evidence regarding the value or status of the property that had been used to secure Ramon's loan. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
" However, more lavish hospitality intended as a quid pro quo to induce favorable treatment in a pending business deal (i.e., to get new business, keep business, or get some other business advantage) could be subject to greater scrutiny under the Act. [read post]