Search for: "SMITH v. BROOKS"
Results 121 - 140
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
In 1992, Plaintiff Levon Brooks was convicted of the murder of three- year-old Courtney Smith. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 02815-20 Mulqueen v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 01813-20 Lanigan v Sunday Life, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 00663-20 Dorante-Day v belfasttelegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
" Read entire update>>- Supreme Court Immigration Decision Means "Patchwork Regulation" For EmployersFrom law firm Constangy, Brooks & Smith LLP: "The U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
Brooks Holland, guest blogging for SCOTUSblog, also discusses the Tinklenberg argument. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Because AT&T's pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system's terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).o May 18, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher &… [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm
Brooks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
Smith. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Patents Rise of machine translation services: (IPKat), USPTO / EPO / JPO progress on ‘common application format’ for expedited examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), Proponents: ‘Time is now’ for TRIPs biodiversity amendment in Doha round: (Intellectual Property Watch), TRIPs amendment in favour of disclosures for genetic resources/traditional knowledge patents gathers support: (Afro-IP), WIPO… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
In Grundberg v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
David Banks has a post about “IPSO, Sunday Mirror and Brooks Newmark”. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
” In holding that Domestic Relations Law § 70 “permits a non-biological, non-adoptive parent to achieve standing to petition for custody and visitation” (Brooke S.B., 28 NY3d at 27), the Court of Appeals stressed that it “has gone to great lengths to escape the inequitable results dictated by a needlessly narrow interpretation of the term ‘parent’ ” (Brooke S.B. at 24). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc. [read post]
