Search for: "SOAP v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin concluded his speech by criticizing the L'Oreal v Bellure decision (the AmeriKat agrees) and that this was an unfortunate development in trade mark law in Europe. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am
You would have realized that “hottest” seems to be a very relative term in the Lone Star State. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:58 pm
Secret of the Islands, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
______________DeCrescenzo v Gonzalez2007 NY Slip Op 09720Decided on December 11, 2007Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on December 11, 2007 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT A. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Seiter, 869 F.2d 1492 (6th Cir. 1992) (plaintiff slipped and fell on a bar of soap while showering and injured his back) Crovetto v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm
” The classic case is Lovenheim v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
* Eponia: a State of mind? [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a significant opinion on the topic of genericness, Elliott v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
AND OTHERS v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am
”[v] In making this point, Farmer cited the earlier case of DeShaney v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Still no soap or sanitization products were provided. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
Wash your mouth out with soap! [read post]
