Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 121 - 140 of 2,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Spokane Indian Tribe (Article III standing and right the right of non-parties to appeal) The Tribal Supreme Court Project published an Update Memorandum on February 23, 2023: https://sct.narf.org/updatememos/2022/02-22-2023.pdfFederal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Barton, et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:36 pm by Barbara Lichman
Regents of Univ. of California, et al., that Court has taken the definitive step of confirming its tentative decision, on the critical ground that “UC Berkeley failed to assess potential noise impacts from loud student parties in residential neighborhoods near campus, a long-standing problem that the [environmental review] improperly dismissed as ‘speculative. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Illinois (1977), denying antitrust standing to indirect purchasers, with 15, and Moran v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
The "AR" in AR-15 stands for "ArmaLite Rifle. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Brief for State of Mississippi et al. as Amici Curiae 7–10; Ante, at 1–2 (GORSUCH, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]