Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 7:23 am
In the recently decided People ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:29 am
On April 30, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
On June 9, in an unpublished decision in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:29 am
Missouri’s crusade to roll back farmed animal protections approved by California voters suffered a fatal blow today when a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s dismissal of the case (State of Missouri ex rel. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
The definitive litmus test for the impartiality and competence of the Wisconsin Supreme Court took the form of a lengthy opinion issued in response to the consolidated action State of Wisconsin ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:39 am
In 2017, dissatisfied with the pace of the state court proceedings, Antoine filed a similar version of his state court petition in federal court. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:24 am
State ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:23 pm
Kenny A. ex rel Winn, 130 S.Ct. 1662 (2010), the claimants filed suit against state and local agencies and individuals, alleging that foster child services were inadequate. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:37 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
In State of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm
Filing an amicus brief on behalf of the State of Oregon in State ex rel. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 10:38 am
., but here are two interesting appeals court decisions from the last few weeks.11th Circuit "Fair Use" Decision -- In International Stamp Art, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:09 pm
Today, the Supreme Court ruled in State ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
