Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B" Results 121 - 140 of 10,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 8:03 pm by Buce
It's probably more than coincidence that two of the books I enjoyed most lately were (a) written by women who (b) used to work as British journalists and (c) went on to get fancy degrees and (d) write sprightly, non-shallow, non-technical introductions to interesting topics.I'll save one of the two for later but for the moment, allow me to showcase Diane Coyle's The Soulful Science, where she tries to show that economists are not as crude, vulgar and… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:12 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
(d) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:37 pm by Robert P. Merten III
LLR, INC., d/b/a LuLaRoe et al., the plaintiff – an Alaska resident and customer of the defendant retailer – alleged she was improperly charged sales tax on clothing purchased from the out-of-state retailer’s “remote consultants” and shipped to her residence in Anchorage, Alaska. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:13 am by Alyzza Austriaco
Kim Reynolds (R) released a bill ( D 5408 ) to state legislative leaders last week that would prohibit state fiduciaries from putting environmental, social and governance concerns ahead of financial returns when investing public pension funds. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 1:09 am by Jack Bogdanski
This one is hawking Measure 117, "rank choice voting," another goofball experiment being foisted on Oregon voters by out-of-state interests, in this case apparently from California. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Much like how a defendant has an interest in having federal law claims against them heard in federal court, a plaintiff has an interest in having their state law claims heard in state court. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:16 am by Gregory Forman
The Court of Appeals recognized the tension between Rule 4(d), SCRCP and Rule 12(b), SCRCP. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He never addressed his interest in or his ability to meet B's physical, emotional and psychological needs, nor did he state any efforts he would make to do so. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:42 am
New Albany, Indiana - An Indiana copyright attorney for Broadcast Music, Inc. of New York, New York ("BMI"), Sony/ATV Songs LLC, Fall Out Boy, Inc. d/b/a Chicago X Softcore Songs, Beechwood Music Corporation, and Universal Music-Z Tunes LLC d/b/a Universal Music Z Songs sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that The Irish Exit, LLC d/b/a The Irish Exit and Matthew McMahan, both of New Albany, Indiana, committed willful copyright… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:03 am by Robert_Brazil
  While maximizing shareholder interests is still a part of the equation, B Corp. directors and officers are not required to make shareholder interest the only consideration. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Sharkey1625 STATE INNOVATION AND PREEMPTION: LESSONS FROM STATE CLIMATE CHANGE EFFORTSAlexandra B. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
The 9th also found no merit in the argument that 404(b) of other drug sales was improperly admitted on the basis that the only evidence was a cooperating witness. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:28 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
A has three adult children (B, C & D) and four minor grandchildren. [read post]