Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF E.D."
Results 121 - 140
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Consumer fraud is also out, as those claims are subsumed by the New Jersey product liability statute. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Eastman Kodak Co., 726 A.2d 955 (New Jersey Super. 1999). [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:17 am
Polo Ralph Lauren Corp., 536 F.Supp.2d 1199, 1202 (E.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Supp. 2d ____, 2008 WL 544564 (E.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:20 pm
New Jersey Air Nat. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Supp. 2d 719 (E.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
The other states (Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, North Dakota, and Utah) use fraud on the FDA as an exception to compliance-based bars on punitive damages. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
New Jersey: Tryanowski v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 6:06 am
The prison officials conducted cell searches in the interest of prison security when it was discoverd that they same scam seen in New Jersey had moved to a Pennsylvania prison. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Astellas Pharma, US., Inc., 2007 WL 2137782 (E.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
LEXIS 58963 (E.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Merck & Co., 878 P.2d 948, 958 n.16 (Nev. 1994) (plurality op.), 969 (dissent also following learned intermediary rule).New Jersey: N.J. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
E.D. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 149, 156-57 (E.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:51 pm
New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 87 S. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
Rather, the Defendant will have to present a defense to the New Jersey state court.Id. at *9-10 (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Semar, 2005 WL 1806344, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
It's about a hot topic - the use and abuse of medical monitoring claims in this type of case.IntroductionOn January 16, 2007, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey handed down a decision in the putative class action case, Sinclair v. [read post]
