Search for: "STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. USA" Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Following the 4th Circuit’s decision in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Organon USA, Inc., 2007 WL 4365312 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Kyle Persaud
South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that if a regulation “denies all economically beneficial or productive use” of property, then the regulation is a taking under the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am by Kyle Persaud
South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that if a regulation “denies all economically beneficial or productive use” of property, then the regulation is a taking under the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
South CarolinaSouth Carolina is favored by 3.5 over Kentucky, as the Gamecocks have the home field advantage. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
After the appellate court sent the South Carolina case back to the trial court in March 2004, Bishop Griswold might have thought his litigation expenses would lighten a bit, but events proved differently. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]