Search for: "STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. USA"
Results 121 - 140
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:18 am
Those types of statements by a District Court Judge in South Carolina, which the Fourth Circuit called "neither wise nor temperate" were the subject of a recusal motion ruled on last week by the Fourth Circuit, in Belue v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:17 am
The United States District Court for South Carolina recently held that a final judgment approving a class settlement should not be afforded full faith and credit. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
Miller’s relied on Opryland USA Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
In this second post of a series examining the self-made constitutional crisis engulfing the Episcopal Church (USA), the focus will be on the complications created by the ongoing existence and treatment of four pseudo-dioceses (San Joaquin, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh and Quincy; another may soon be forced into existence in South Carolina).These are all invited disasters; they need not have turned out as badly as they have. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
After the appellate court sent the South Carolina case back to the trial court in March 2004, Bishop Griswold might have thought his litigation expenses would lighten a bit, but events proved differently. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
ComerBelow is a case brief of the South Carolina Supreme Court's August 16, 2010 decision in Branham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
No adequacy due to South Carolina’s rejection of medical monitoring.Zinser v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
In addition to California, the other states with at least a few such prisoners are Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Virginia. [read post]
