Search for: "STATE v LANCE"
Results 121 - 140
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
In a recent insurance policy case, Lance. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
In a recent insurance policy case, Lance. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:29 pm
On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Puerto Rico v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
USERRA states there is no statute of limitations for bringing a USERRA claim and no imposition of court costs or fees may be charged to a USERRA plaintiff. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
There is no formal definition of works of artistic craftsmanship, but the published guidance has produced suggestions (pg 7) as to how the courts will approach this type of work based on the cases of Hensher (George) Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd[1975] RPC 31, HL and Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another [2012] 1 AC 208:• It is not enough for a work (such as a piece of furniture) to look attractive to qualify as a work of artistic… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
CRIMINAL – INTIMIDATION DA 15-0329, 2016 MT 97N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
The court relied only on some general language from Lance v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:41 am
Supreme Court's March 30 decision in Luis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:32 pm
The defendants hired Lance T. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
In a 2013 paper, Kevin V. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:48 am
(See Trident Products and Services, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
SeeBouchard v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Beyond that, Yates-based preemption would erase the non-generic stop-selling claim allowed in Pennsylvania in Lance (2014 -2). [read post]
