Search for: "STATE v WATKINS" Results 121 - 140 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the estate of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors was heard on 25th July. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
McNeily, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, July 11, 2019 Tags: Fiduciary duties, Investment Advisers Act, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, U.S. federal courts [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:26 am
On April 30, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in The Robare Group, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Devin Watkins writes that the court’s ruling in Gundy v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
He also identifies a related function—Congress’s “informing function”—which was recognized by the Supreme Court in Watkins v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Judge Watkins questioned the defense’s assertion that Brady applies both to sentencing and in the military commissions, following United States v. [read post]