Search for: "STATE v. VIDAL"
Results 121 - 140
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
Vidal. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Vidal case out of New York City, one of several consolidated cases before the justices today. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:02 pm
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
As to individuation, the Court applied the approach taken in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:30 am
En el caso Return Mail v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am
The justices did not schedule New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 1:49 pm
Batalla Vidal. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Vidal. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
New Relists Republic of Sudan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Vidal, 18-589 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
