Search for: "STEPHENS PRODUCE COMPANY v. STEPHENS" Results 121 - 140 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled FairPlay Canada, the CRTC and OpenMedia: Who Got the “Big Win” on Pirate Site-Blocking? [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am by Picl Guest Blogger
We have seen questionable statistics often repeated to support this theory, but no one has produced validation or verification. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Chiappari is a partner at Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke in New York City. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926,  which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
On October 30, 2016, the International Company for Agricultural Production & Processing (ICAPP) recalled all of its frozen strawberries that were imported into the U.S. since January 1, 2016. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
On the other side of the Atlantic, the ongoing case of Baltimore v AbbVie is interesting as it represents a challenge to differential entry settlements (i.e. where a generic company is allowed to enter certain markets but not others). [read post]