Search for: "Sam Bray"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 11:30 am
UPDATE: My coblogger Sam Bray has a somewhat different perspective on this: Here are the three relevant principles: Protect speech, because equity follows the law. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
[A few thoughts on the states' brief and their amici] Last month co-blogger Sam Bray and I filed an amicus brief arguing that the states did not have standing to challenge the Biden administration's unlawful student loan forgiveness program. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
At The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Sam Bray points out that the “Supreme Court said two interesting things about equity [last] week”; he notes that “the takeaway from the court’s opinion” in an election-law case, North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:29 pm
This case has an unusual history, so it's understandable that it could raise interesting jurisdictional issues (such as the one Sam Bray flagged). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
(Sam Bray has articulated this point well). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:13 pm
In addition to numerous Democrats, advocates include prominent conservatives such as David French, John Podhoretz (who harshly criticized the earlier effort to impeach Trump, and leading legal scholars, such as my co-bloggers Keith Whittington, and (in a joint post) Will Baude, Sam Bray, and Steve Sachs. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:31 am
Will Baude and Sam Bray, for instance, think there is no standing here. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
A very helpful and interesting paper by my colleague Sam Bray — one of the nation’s top remedies scholars — which he kindly agreed to let me pass along (also available in PDF here): equity, n. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
Another issue to look out for is the question of statutory jurisdiction flagged in this amicus brief by co-blogger Sam Bray, occasional VC guest poster Michael McConnell, and Kevin Walsh. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Co-blogger Sam Bray and I have just filed an amici brief in Biden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
" Here, I outsource my views to Aditya Bamzai and Sam Bray, who rather persuasively argue that the Debs court, while going beyond strict proprietary interests, still relied on the government's property-like interest in the Nation's highways and waterways, and that Debs was perceived as a property-interest case by contemporaries. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
(Sam Bray wrote about the application here.) [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:35 am
Richard Cordray resigned as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on Friday evening. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am
I recently spoke with the father and son team of Mike Paulsen and Luke Paulsen about their new book, The Constitution: An Introduction (Basic Books, 2015). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Preliminary results are reported below.Once again, it is time for the Entry Level Hiring Survey. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Originalists who are denounced in the essay include Volokh Conspiracy contributors Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Sam Bray (Notre Dame), Stephen Sachs (Duke), Will Baude (Chicago), me (Denver), and frequent VC guest writer Rob Natelson (presently my colleague at the Independence Institute, formerly at Montana). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
