Search for: "Samsung Electronics America"
Results 121 - 140
of 325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 7:55 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Robert Bosch GmbH of Germany Bosch Security Systems, Inc. of Fairpoint, New York Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. of Korea Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc. d/b/a Samsung Techwin America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Sony Corporation of Japan Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California In addition,… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: D&M Holdings, Inc. of Japan D&M Holdings US, Inc. of Mahwah, New Jersey Denon Electronics (USA) LLC of Mahwah, New Jersey Funai Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan Funai Corp., Inc. of Rutherford, New Jersey Haier Group Corp. of China Haier America Trading, LLC of New York, New York Harman International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut Inkel… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:22 am
Fonkel Meubelmarketing of the Netherlands (953 designs) overtook Samsung Electronics of the Republic of Korea (862) as the largest user of the Hague System (if you never heard of Fonkel Meubelmarketing - me neither. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
The High Court found that such services, comprising the cut and scanning of books per client’s request, amount to copyright infringement.Moving to designs, Paul Tjiam and Hidde Koenraad recaps on MARQUES Class99 the decision issued by the District Court of the Hague in the consolidated cases Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Maxperian NL BV and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Digital Revolution BV [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:14383, para 4.74], which held that toner… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont, California Dell,… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:59 pm
(“Samsung”) and Respondents Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed by Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:50 pm
Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of… [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:30 am
Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Apple Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm
Apple further states that on April 15, 2011, it filed suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and related entities in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
No. 337-TA-634, where Sharp had alleged that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:45 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey AT&T, Inc. of Dallas, Texas Best Buy Co., Inc. of Richfield, Minnesota BrandsMart USA, Inc. of Hollywood, Florida In addition, Chief ALJ Paul J. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:12 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of South Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc.… [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 21-170 (Supreme Court 2021). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America,… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
The complaint alleges that chip manufacturers/distributors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively “Samsung”), and downstream manufacturers/sellers… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm
According to the Order, Complainants Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC (collectively, “Spansion”) moved to compel Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents, witnesses, information, and samples… [read post]
