Search for: "Samuel Harms" Results 121 - 140 of 1,111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito both filed concurring opinions, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
UPDATE: See also this post about a similar controversy in the Samuel Bankman-Fried case. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:31 am by Jack Hoover
Justice Samuel Alito expressed to counsel, for example, that he was “completely confused by whatever argument you’re making at the present time. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Democratic appointees Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan as well as Republican appointees Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett each joined parts of Justice Gorsuch’s opinion, while the principal dissent by Republican appointee Chief Justice John Roberts was joined by his fellow Republican appointees Justices Samuel Alito and Kavanaugh, as well as by Democratic appointee Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am by John Elwood
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, filed an opinion dissenting from that denial. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
On May 15, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined only by Justice Samuel Alito, dissented from the Supreme Court’s refusal to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Alabama’s use of lethal injection as a method of execution. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am by Amy Howe
Millett also “rejected the government’s claim that the members of Congress do not have standing to sue because any injury from the denial of their request would only harm Congress as an institution, rather than them personally. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am by Ben Sperry
From an economic point of view, it makes sense to impose liability on intermediaries when they are the least-cost avoider: i.e., the party that is best positioned to limit harm, even if they aren’t the party committing the harm. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
The expansion of Form PF requirements ironically could be harmful from a systemic risk perspective. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:44 am by Ashley Belanger
On top of "continuing to give app developers access to users’ private information" that Meta claimed had been cut off, the FTC alleges that Facebook has caused new harm. [read post]
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Were the original fears of harmful hospital strikes realized as a result? [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Fortunately, at least one member of the Court is willing to defend the Court against the never-ending barrage of attacks: Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Food and Drug Administration risks harming public health. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by JURIST Staff
Alito argued that the applicants had failed to demonstrate the likelihood of irreparable harm and accused the FDA of leveraging court injunctions to evade agency procedures and judicial review. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am by jonathanturley
  However, there are dissents from two of the most vocal critics of abortion rights: Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]