Search for: "Sanchez v. U.s.*"
Results 121 - 140
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
Bank of America, NA v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:33 pm
The opinion, Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:16 am
In Ojeda-Sanchez, et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
Sanchez, 269 F.3d 1250, 1314 (11th Cir. 2001) ( en banc ). [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
Sanchez, 40 AD3d 446 [1st Dept. 2007]; Graham v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 06, 2008 Santos-Sanchez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
§ 107 (2000).7 Meeropol v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 550 [2008]). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:08 am
" Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
In Sanchez-Lllamas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Sanchez-Badillo, No. 051800, 052045, 052047 Convictions and sentences for conspiring to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) jury's conspiracy verdict was not supported by evidence; 2) trial court made sentencing errors; 3) evidence was insufficient to support jury's verdict against one of the defendants on weapons charges and prosecutorial misconduct entitles him to a new trial; and 4) trial judge made impermissible… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:35 pm
US v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
" (Sanchez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:47 pm
Sanchez, 59 M.J. 566 (A.F. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:17 am
" Sanchez v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Sanchez, No. 07-30578 Where, at the time of sentencing there is no guideline in effect for the particular offense of conviction, and the Sentencing Commission has promulgated a proposed guideline applicable to the offense of conviction, the district court's failure to consider the proposed guideline when sentencing the defendant may result in reversible plain error. [read post]
