Search for: "Sanders v. Department of Justice"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Section 403(d) would require states to report a description of their laws to the Department of Justice. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:55 am
To begin with, imagine that President Bernie Sanders issues the following Executive Order: In enforcing Title VI, and identifying evidence of discrimination based on race, color, or national origin against Palestinian-Americans, all executive departments shall consider the following examples to the extent that they might be useful as evidence of discriminatory intent: Denying the Palestinian people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that any Palestinian state… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/837171.opn.pdf In his dissent, Justice Sanders noted that precedent dictates that opinion testimony regarding a defendant’s veracity is unfairly prejudicial to the defendant because it invades the exclusive province of the jury. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Suits for declaratory and/or injunctive relief would be brought against relevant officials in their official capacities, just as APA suits are, and would be defended by the Department of Justice. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.opn.pdf In her dissent, Justice Stephens, joined by Justice Sanders, argued that the case should have been remanded to a superior court for a reference hearing to resolve unanswered factual questions, and pointed out that the majority mischaracterized Mr. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Schultz: In a plurality opinion authored by Justice Chambers and joined by Justices Sanders, Stephens, James Johnson and Charles Johnson, the Court overturned Ms. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Our condolences to these departed relists. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
On April 19, the White House responded by referring the committee to the Department of Defense on some aspects of the request, claiming not to have possession of documents relevant to other parts of the request, signaling that documents responsive to other aspects of the request may be classified, or indicating its view that some o [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
” He said, “Well, just call me Ricky Sanders. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
"Writing in the 1958 case of Trop v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
Comms. on authorities' use, effectiveness, and privacy impact Sunsets: Rolls back sunset of FISA Amendments Act to 6/1/15 NSL authorities under ECPA (18 USC 2709), RFPA (12 USC 3414(a)(5)), FCRA (15 USC 1681u(a), (b)), and NSA of 1947 (50 USC 3162) revert back to pre-Patriot Act standard on 6/1/15; and FCRA Section 627 (15 USC 1681v) is repealed Udall-Wyden (9) S.1182: A bill to modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require specific evidence for access to… [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
HENRY, Appellants, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
Sanders, 128 S. [read post]
