Search for: "Sauer v. Sauer"
Results 121 - 140
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
The GPH Employment Law Blog has a post about that case, Fillpoint, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:27 pm
Solicitor General, and Hans Sauer of BIO, the brief argues that the patent-eligibility of isolated DNA claims is unchanged by the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Gioeli v Vlachos, 89 AD3d 984; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:13 am
Battaglia v Grillo 2012 NY Slip Op 31588(U) June 6, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 014807-10 Judge: Vito M. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:31 pm
By Kwame Mensah -- A free-flowing panel discussing the potential impact of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
In order to recover damages in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must establish "that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, [*3]Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y. 3d 438, 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385 (N.Y. 2007)). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:14 am
In a legal malpractice action, "a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused [the] plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]).… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
Likewise, I am not convinced that the Court of Chancery’s decision in Maric Capital Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:10 pm
Law Seminars International (LSI) will be offering a one-hour analysis on "Mayo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court in Egelhoff v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Sauer, Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:14 am
"The complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff neglected to plead that she would have prevailed in the underlying action, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, but for the defendants' alleged malpractice in failing to file certain motions and appeal from certain orders issued in that action (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Kuzmin v… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court in Egelhoff v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 442 (2007); Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 (2 Dept 2007). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Bilin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
In order to prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:01 pm
Justice Cohen in Sauer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 [2007]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169 [1987]). [read post]
