Search for: "Scott Dodson"
Results 121 - 140
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Scott Dodson (William and Mary School of Law) has posted The Complexity of Jurisdictional Clarity to SSRN. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:26 am
Drafts of many of the papers presented are available on SSRN, including: Scott Dodson, The Complexity of Jurisdictional Clarity Joshua... [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
Scott Dodson (William & Mary School of Law) has posted The Complexity of Jurisdictional Clarity (97 Virginia Law Review 1 (forthcoming 2011)) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am
In an article in the Michigan Law Review, Professor Scott Dodson acknowledges that problem and argues that the solution is to permit limited pre-dismissal discovery to give plaintiffs an opportunity to gather the facts necessary to meet the plausibility standard. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:15 am
Readers may be interested in these recent posts on PrawfsBlawg about teaching civil procedure: Things You Oughta Know if You Teach Civil Procedure, by Scott Dodson (William & Mary) More things to know if you teach civ pro, by Howard... [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:06 am
As the lawyer-biologist Scott Dodson points out, the process by which constitutional precedents are selected for ongoing life, or instead for overruling and death, cannot plausibly be described as a form of natural selection. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:11 pm
- Scott Dodson [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:16 am
Scott Dodson (William & Mary) has published Justice Souter and the Civil Rules in the Washington University Law Review Commentaries. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:12 pm
Professor Scott Dodson (William & Mary School of Law) has posted "Federal Pleading and State Presuit Discovery" on SSRN. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
Professor Scott Dodson (William & Mary) has posted "Justice Souter and the Civil Rules" on the Social Sciences Research Network. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am
I am not sure either effort works--a point on which Scott Dodson, writing at Civ Pro/Fed Courts Blog, agrees). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:30 am
Below, Professor Scott Dodson (William & Mary) comments on today's SCOTUS decision in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:50 am
Contributors include former GuestPrawfs Scott Dodson, Tung Yin, and Hillel Levin, as well as PermaPrawfs Steve Vladeck and myself. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am
Ed Hartnett (Seton Hall) sent this compilation to the CivPro listserv (gleaned in part from Scott Dodson's New Pleadings, New Discovery), showing the multiple different proposals that have been made to undo Iqbal. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:10 pm
Professor Scott Dodson (William & Mary School of Law) has posted "New Pleadings, New Discovery" on SSRN. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
Scott Dodson, Against Twombly & Iqbal -- A Reply to Drug & Device Law Post, June 5, 2009. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
(P & F) 567(see LexisOne, or e.g Supreme Court of the United States (.pdf))Scott Dodson at the Virginia Law Review writes in Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
.'"Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas) at the Civil Procedure Prof Blog:"[A]pplying a restrictive pleading standard transsubstantively will surely result in fewer meritorious cases filed, more meritorious cases dismissed, and less unlawful conduct redressed, particularly for cases in which a less restrictive standard could achieve a better balance between efficiency and justice. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:02 am
Here is a useful post by Scott Dodson on the Civil... [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:12 pm
As Scott Dodson argues here, it is problematic that the Court has reintroduced two tiers of facts (conclusory v. non-conclusory), a remnant of fact pleading (which distinguished between evidentiary and ultimate facts). [read post]
