Search for: "Search Warrant (D)"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2013, 11:12 am
Fearon, 2013 ONCA 106 sets out general guidelines for searching cell phones incident to arrest without the need for a warrant. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:31 am
LEXIS 101239 (D. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:18 pm
A search warrant for a specific email address was not a general warrant. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:23 am
The police had a search warrant for the upstairs apartment. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:29 am
Search warrant for seizure of defendant’s computer and search for child pornography images was not overbroad. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
LEXIS 47584 (D. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
Polis (D-CO), Rep. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
LEXIS 5639 (D. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:22 am
Plaintiffs § 1983 claim failed as to digging holes on their property under a search warrant for evidence from a 30 year old homicide because it was reasonable to believe some of the evidence sought would be buried. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:45 am
The search warrant gave probable cause to believe there was a gun on the premises. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Next time Hank wants to Use GPS to Track a Suspect in Breaking Bad, he'd better get a warrant. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Hoop was charged with Class D felonies for dealing and possessing marijuana. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
Smith, 899 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1993), the Fifth Circuit upheld the search of apartment 15-D where the search warrant specified apartment 15-C based upon incorrect information provided by the CI. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:03 am
Accord, In re Search Warrants Issued on April, 26, 2004 (D. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 5:46 pm
Polis (D-CO), Rep. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 am
Here's some new legislation out of California I'd like to see passed in Texas. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 am
LEXIS 106927 (D. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
LEXIS 125305 (D. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
LEXIS 8274 (D. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
As Rule 41(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure explains, a federal agent who requests a warrant to search a particular place and seize evidence found there must demonstrate that he/she has probable cause to believe evidence of a crime will be found in the place to be searched and/or the thing(s) to be seized. [read post]
