Search for: "Senior v. Hope" Results 121 - 140 of 1,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Seely hopes that legislation will stop “legalized gangsterism” employed by wealthy oligarchs and politicians hoping “to spy, to snoop, to smear, and to sue” their critics. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 3:37 pm by CMS
In this post, Eilidh Douglas, Senior Associate in the ICE Disputes team at CMS, previews the case of Republic of Mozambique v Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL (Holding) and Ors, which was heard by the UK Supreme Court on 24 and 25 January 2023. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
An way one looks at it, the situation in Cuba produces far more cynicism than it does either hope or re¡course to some saving ideology. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
I will be there from Thursday through Saturday, and I hope to catch up those who will be attending. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For whom, after all, do we write and hope to influence? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Owiso Owiso
As the African Union Transitional Justice Policy (AUTJP) notes in paragraph 46(v), a fundamental benchmark for peace agreements is the inclusion of comprehensive provisions on justice, accountability, and reconciliation. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The ECtHR handed down judgement in Marcinkevicius v Lithuania (Application no. 24919/20) on 15 November 2022. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]