Search for: "Seo v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
One of his Chloé ads stated: “We work directly with the #1 factory in China for perfect mirror quality fake Chloé Paddington handbags. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Carolyn Elefant
  www.royginsburg.com Related posts:Does A Client Really Care if Your Firm Has Great SEO? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
* EFF on how the Kerry-McCain privacy bill would preempt state law [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
Cleveland’s counsel, Chris Finnerty, further stated: The jury found that web hosts and SEO’s cannot rely solely on third parties to police their web sites and provide actual notice of counterfeit sales from the brand owners. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:32 pm by Marie Louise
Advanced System Concepts, Inc (Likelihood of Confusion) Jury awards damages against web designer/SEO/host on contributory trademark infringement theory: Roger Cleveland v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
Price, potentially exposing SEOs/web designers to secondary liability as well [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
Murphy (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court South Carolina – SEO/Web design consultant faces contributory trademark liability for ‘Copycat’ e-commerce site: Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:27 pm by Venkat
The disclaimer may not be optimally SEOed language, but any SEO is surely amused by this remedy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:05 am by peteboyd
  The firms ranged from 15 to 200 attorneys, were located in 6 different states, were in major metro areas, and practiced in a variety of areas. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
In any event, many SEO gurus these days seem to think that the Google search algorithms have evolved beyond relying on meta tags. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Eric
We may learn more about these pitfalls from the other trademark owner-v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Carolyn Elefant
Before the Supreme Court's 1977 landmark decision in Bates v. [read post]