Search for: "Sharp v. Johnson" Results 121 - 140 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
That is only one of many discoveries his fresh eyes and sharp mind spotted. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2015 the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in Murray v Associated Newspapers, [2015] EWCA Civ 488. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:49 pm
Co-blogger Will Baude recently blogged about the Supreme Court’s unusual re-argument order in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: Alaska – As Energy Boom Ends, a Political Identity Crisis in Alaska New York Times – Kirk Johnson | Published: 10/8/2014 Economic anxiety in Alaska is roiling an already sharp-edged political season, focused on one of the most competitive U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there will be an application in the case of Johnson v Hampshire NHS Trust. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth, Inc., ___ N.W.2d ___, 2014 WL 3377071 (Iowa July 11, 2014), but Huck isn’t even the last  case on our scorecard any longer – that honor currently belongs to Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and  Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:25 am by Adam Levitin
Sharpe (DC school desegregation)? [read post]