Search for: "Shell, I. v. Shell, B."
Results 121 - 140
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm
” 35 U.S.C. 314(b). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday in Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm
Zavhorodnii, Oksana Orel, Galyna Muliar, Olga I. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
The Designs Directive was implemented in this manner, wherein SI 2001 No. 3949 amended the Registered Designs Act 1949 to produce an effectively entire new act, within the shell of the original.Some readers may recall that the constitutionality of this was challenged in the case of Oakley v Animal, reported by the IPKat here. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
” Kasirer J.: “I would dismiss the appeal … In sum, in respect of both the mental health and the after-the-fact evidence, I see no reviewable errors in the jury charge and, on these points, I would adopt the majority reasons of van Rensburg J.A. as my own, without reserve. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:56 am
District Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York in Vogel v Boris involving a falling out between members of a SPAC sponsor following the completion of an acquisition. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 5:48 am
[b]ut before they could do so, Fidel and Hassan got into a fight. . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
This guest post was written by Paul B. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
I. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Christopher admitted, however, that `I was a little uncertain because, you know, a story could be too—you know, too good to be true at times. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
