Search for: "Sides v. Duke University"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
In Monday’s oral argument in Astrue v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Accord University of South Alabama v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
In Messner v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Dukes). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
But the other six justices engaged in a wide-ranging and quite interesting discussion—asking challenging questions of both sides—of whether the immunity for grand jury testimony is proper. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
Dukes), but others go the other way (Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:30 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:52 am
Schwartz, Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
Most of the cases are landmarks in the light of what happened after them, though in the case of eBay v MerceXchange this review remains convinced that its landmark status was conferred by what happened before the decision, like a hurricane that builds up its momentum, instills massive fear and then misses its supposed victims. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Previously, Dean Chemerinsky was a professor at Duke Law School, University of Southern California Law School, and DePaul College of Law. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:57 pm
Previously, Dean Chemerinsky was a professor at Duke Law School, University of Southern California Law School, and DePaul College of Law. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
The plaintiffs in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
This post comes to us from Lawrence Baxter (Duke University School of Law) as part of our Roundtable on Teaching Banking Law/Financial Institutions. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
