Search for: "Simply Right Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 8,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
Texas Instruments, Inc., 1-11-cv-01254 (DED February 13, 2013, Order) (Robinson, J.). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
That is, even if the regulation gave Tempo the right to raise these arguments in a cross-appeal, and thus obtain the benefit of additional briefing, the regulation simply says that Tempo “may” do so, not that it must. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
The Crown’s chutzpah runs throughout the entire line of post-1982 Aboriginal rights cases from Guerin to the most recent decision, Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
§106 sets forth a list of exclusive rights for copyright owners. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
If government is permitted to simply confiscate property from a small minority of citizens - those fortunate enough to own land on the ocean - then the property rights we all cherish can be taken, too. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
Trotter and Morton Industrial Contracting Inc., 2023 MBCA 64 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:09 am
FPIC Insurance Group Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Caterpillar, Inc., 227 F. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 8:19 am
Instead of simply ignoring his legal rights, Suri got a lawyer. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:54 pm
You may be aware that Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, had its initial public offering (“IPO”) on March 2 of this year. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:21 am
Terasen Gas Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:19 am
Demonstrating a “distinctive identifier” requires proof that it is used as a trademark not simply a company selling services. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am
DomainBaron.com, D2001-0470 (WIPO June 30, 2001); and Innotek, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:05 am
Nova Southeastern University, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Mid Atlantic Services, Inc., 126 S. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
In the famous opinion of Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 415 F. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:32 am
Putting aside the question as to whether a particular corporate name is registrable as a trademark, or is simply a trade name not actionable under the UDRP, the Panel in Applied Technology Holdings, Inc. v. u-Logic, Dan Stirling, D2010-0042 (WIPO February 17, 2010) held that the Complainant (ipso facto) owned a common law trademark in APPLIED TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:20 pm
The Appellate Division, First Department, answered this question in the negative in Speranza v Repro Lab Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 01543 (1st Dept. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Much like browsewrap agreements, the enforceability of sign-in wrap agreements turns on the clarity of notice provided to users such that registering or completing a transaction on the website constitutes consent to the website’s terms.[12] Thus, simply placing the terms and conditions that apply to an NFT, including any commercial rights being granted, on a link accessible at the bottom of the NFT issuer’s website is unlikely to bind the initial NFT purchaser. [read post]
