Search for: "Sims v. Majors" Results 121 - 140 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Earlier this month, retired Justice John Paul Stevens sat down with one of his former clerks, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher, for an interview. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judge Sims joined Chief Judge Tozzi. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Russ Bensing
On Monday, I talked about State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Full disclosure – Bexis filed a brief for PLAC in Phillips on the Restatement Third issue.While three justices aren’t a majority of Pennsylvania’s seven-member Supreme Court, in Phillips they outnumbered the court’s Azzarello supporters 3-2 (there was a vacancy and an obscure concurrence in the result). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
  The leading case from that period was Prince Albert v Strange (1849) 2 De Gex & Sim 652 the Court granted an injunction to restrain publication of private etchings of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:43 pm by Steve Salop
As Joe Sims has observed, “elections matter,” so a change in enforcement policy would not be all that surprising. [read post]