Search for: "Small v. Federal Government et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
Wright et al. at paras 51, 54. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
[A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors] A cert petition (available here) has been filed with the Supreme Court in the latest case involving "faithless electors," Chiafalo et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
At stake here is whether the FCC should open a rulemaking to consider changes to program rules governing fiber construction. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
Maacama Watershed Alliance, et al v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
At stake is whether the FCC should open a rulemaking to consider changes to program rules governing fiber construction. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Bruhl focuses on the void-for-vagueness doctrine and its application to federal sentencing laws in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
District Judge Dan Aaron Polster, who is presiding over the federal multidistrict opioid litigation, certified such a class, comprising every local government in the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
GAO Report on Supporting “Off-School Premises Access” through E-rate On July 29, 2019, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report entitled FCC Should Assess Making Off-School Premises Access Eligible for Additional Federal Support. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:16 am
In a new decision last week, State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:54 am
United States, No. 19-308C, et al. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
Sex and sexual encounters will continue to occupy an important place in the business of government. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:07 pm
And with respect to the small subset of "hate speech" that is not constitutionally protected—words that are an "incitement to violence" under the standard set forth in Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
HOAs and the FHA Lau et al v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
WellsgreenSCA Inc., et al, June 19, 2019, U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
