Search for: "Small v. The State of New York et al" Results 121 - 140 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  Presumably, the Court will hold onto that case until it decides McDonald; the same is likely for the New York case, Maloney v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
World Pac Int’l AG (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Dependent claim is not invalid under § 112 ¶ 4 merely because it recites only structural limitations of independent method claim: McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm by Joshua Davey
NDG Financial Corp. et al., case number 1:15-cv-5211, filed in July 2015 in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
The Internet Association, SIIA et al. brief contains an interesting explanation of how "article of manufacture" must be interpreted differently from a "machine. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:14 am by Richard Hunt
Feasibility and cost Bronx Independent Living Services et al v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Paradoxically, perhaps, the project of legalization evidences how a love of ancient custom, in this case the customs and patterns of the post-Westphalian law-state, remains, while power shifts to those, enterprises included, that have brought about a revolution in the state and in the meaning of legalization in a new world order that has yet to be revealed. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]