Search for: "Smiley v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
. - SMILEY v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm
In a 2010 case, Velez v. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:21 am
Smiley QUEENS COUNTYFamily LawAgency Fails to Establish Father Neglected Son, Child's Mental, Emotional State ImpairedMatter of Julius G. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:20 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
Robinsons' letter of 21st February stated that the product would be a replica of the 1997 version of Henry, and repeated its request that Numatic state whether any rights in or relating to Henry would be infringed. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am
Broder) and the smiley face. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:54 am
Loufrani v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
See Mine O'Mine, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Adura – Eco-mark suit highlights struggle to be noticed in clean tech space: Adura Technologies v Adura Systems (Green Patent Blog) Arizone State University – SanTan Brewing Co decides not to fight ASU’s cease and desist letter re ‘Sun Devil Ale’ and holds naming contest to find new moniker for the brew (Name Wire) Chevron - Gas station at former Texaco site spurs trademark… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
(See Smiley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
First, Smiley alleges that these Counts present no case or controversy as required by the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C § 2201, and Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:32 am
Bruce Braley] Related: Carter Wood at Point of Law, Washington Times, David Frum, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (on provision in health bill discouraging states from adopting limits on lawyers' fees or awards). [read post]
