Search for: "Smith et al v. Grant et al" Results 121 - 140 of 493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm by Michael Erdman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:02 am
Fullmore, et al (NFP) - "The BZA's denial of Canter's application was based upon substantial evidence. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:29 pm by MICHAEL H. ERDMAN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al., No. 17-1229 (Supreme Court 2018), the petitioner has asked the Supreme Court to offer its statement on whether Congress altered the “on sale bar” to now apply only to non-confidential sales or offers. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm by Priscilla Smith
[i] Frost JJ, et al., Publicly Funded Contraceptive Services at U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:18 am by Kaitlyn E. Stone and Jennifer P. Smith
Hoboken Planning Board, et al., an unpublished decision, a developer was granted PUD approval in 1997 for a mixed use waterfront project that included residential high-rise apartment buildings, commercial retail space, a parking garage, and tennis courts. [read post]