Search for: "Smith v. Army"
Results 121 - 140
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
Currently before the Ninth Circuit is an appeal in the case of Fyock v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
Army Corps of Engineers: The Corps Needs to Take Steps to Identify All Projects and Studies Eligible for Deauthorization GAO-14-699: Published: Aug 21, 2014. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
It was Jeremy Hunt’s former special adviser Adam Smith and News Corporation lobbyist Frédéric Michel, however, who dominated the news coverage. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
Nacre AS v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
These guns were produced for the Danish and Dutch armies. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
Six of the nine justices who heard the case in March at the Supreme Court overturned High Court and Court of Appeal judgments over the death of Private Jason Smith in Iraq while serving with the Territorial Army. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Review of Robert Wood's article "Factor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Army. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
Ghana The President of the National House of Chiefs has filed a privacy claim against the Army after the construction of a six story building near his private residence, which had towers and wings overlooking his house. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Fitch, The Solomon Amendment: A War on Campus, 2006 Army Law. 12, 12 (2006) [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
In an exhaustive study, the Army found that the effects of Army life on families and their spouses were the most important reasons why people left the military. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
The case is Latimer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
Smith v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
Arizona v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
