Search for: "Smith v. Department of Human Resources" Results 121 - 140 of 216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
’ Chris Silver Smith on Search Engine Land has given some advice to defamation victims who wish to proceed in the current climate, given that Google has “essentially halted processing of defamation removal requests. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
One controversy is whether the Bill is human rights compliant in relation to Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) whose marginal note reads “No punishment without law”. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Chris Silver Smith has looked at what could be a recent policy shift in Google’s longstanding informal policy of granting court-ordered defamation removal requests. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am by Joy Waltemath
“In order for employees in human resources positions to claim retaliation, they need to first clearly establish that they were engaged in protected activities other than the general work involved in their employment,” the court explained, quoting a federal district court in Kentucky in Lewis- Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Taylor (1982) 129 Cal.App.3d 745, 752.), an employee’s letter to the human resources department charging her manager with sexual harassment. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  BACKGROUND   Last week the SEC issued a settled administrative order finding that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (now rebranded as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) failed to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources – dealing with whether a plaintiff qualified as a prevailing party – said that a plaintiff must obtain a “judicially sanctioned change in the legal relationship of the parties. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dame Janet Smith’s report into culture and practices at the BBC during the time that Jimmy Saville worked there was published this week. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Cybereagle’s Graham Smith gives his reaction to the report here. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Charles Smith’s discrete testimony had allegedly contributed to a number of miscarriages of justice relating to infant deaths. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am by L. Julius M. Turman and Eric M. Walder
Reed Smith RECOMMENDS: Any employer who uses E-Verify to confirm the legality of its workforce should become familiar with the new strict parameters regarding its use, and establish acceptable policies and training for human resources, as well as documenting their actual use of it. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Brett Clayton Smith began legal proceedings in 2013 after being compared to “Dennis Denuto”, a lawyer in Australian film The Castle by the former husband of his daughter-in-law. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Chronic Failure to Control Prisoner Isolation in US and Canadian Law Lisa Kerr, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law(2015) Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 482-530 Excerpt: Introduction, Sections II & V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
On 22 October 2015 there will be an application in the case of Barnes v Smith & ors. [read post]