Search for: "Smith v. State of Maryland"
Results 121 - 140
of 722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 10:26 am
It's by John Wagner.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm
Here is how bad such a presumption is in Maryland: "[U]nder Maryland law, 'knowledge of the contents of the vehicle can be imputed to the driver of the vehicle.' State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 pm
Thompson, and his lone dissent in yesterday’s Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court's 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am
Smith and James P. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
Maryland, from 1963; Napue v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Maryland, supra(citing United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
’ Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:44 am
"); Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
New York also cited concerns voiced by several federalism scholars who argued that this type of subpoena can put state sovereignty at risk, and it may disrupt an ongoing enforcement matter.Separately, Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh announced that 15 state attorneys general sent a letter to Chairman Smith urging him to withdraw subpoena requests made to New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:20 pm
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court decided Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
Nacre AS v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:01 am
From Edokobi v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
LeJeune v. [read post]
