Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 121 - 140
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
United States Trustee v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Bowers, 660 F.2d 527 (5th Cir. 1981) (child abuse); United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
” Also in the news is the recent effort by Common Cause to have the Department of Justice investigate whether Justices Scalia and Thomas should have recused themselves from the Citizens United decision in light of their alleged ties to Koch Industries, which Common Cause describes as “a major political player that directly benefited from the Citizens United decision. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am
See Smith v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
The American Constitution Society interviewed Paul Smith, counsel for the plaintiffs in the landmark Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
In her petition, Smith asks the justices to review these holdings and potentially, if the law is generally applicable, to revisit the prevailing standard from Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:59 pm
Department of Justice to "enhance the state's sex offender registry by making the sex offender information readily available to law enforcement agencies. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
The United States will be represented by Deputy Solicitor General Greg Garre. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
After considering views from the various government departments, cabinet secretaries, and the Justice Department, the Solicitor General’s office “made a judgment to stay where we were. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
In United States v. [read post]