Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice" Results 121 - 140 of 765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
” Also in the news is the recent effort by Common Cause to have the Department of Justice investigate whether Justices Scalia and Thomas should have recused themselves from the Citizens United decision in light of their alleged ties to Koch Industries, which Common Cause describes as “a major political player that directly benefited from the Citizens United decision. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
The American Constitution Society interviewed Paul Smith, counsel for the plaintiffs in the landmark Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
In her petition, Smith asks the justices to review these holdings and potentially, if the law is generally applicable, to revisit the prevailing standard from Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:59 pm
Department of Justice to "enhance the state's sex offender registry by making the sex offender information readily available to law enforcement agencies. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Garrett Hinck, Matthew Kahn
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
The United States will be represented by Deputy Solicitor General Greg Garre. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
After considering views from the various government departments, cabinet secretaries, and the Justice Department, the Solicitor General’s office “made a judgment to stay where we were. [read post]