Search for: "Somerville, Appeal of" Results 121 - 140 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
., A-3843-08T1, June 16, 2010: Appeals can only be taken from judgments and orders, not opinions. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff's only opposition to defendant's cross motion was an attorney affirmation and various documents which, as relevant to this appeal, consisted primarily of billing records. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:59 pm by PaulKostro
Div. 2010), A-1822-08, May 21, 2010: “The Frivolous Litigation Act [N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1] does not apply to a frivolous appeal. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:19 pm by PaulKostro
The decision on whether a judge should recuse himself from hearing a matter lies within the sound discretion of that judge, and the judge’s decision should not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse thereof. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:17 am by PaulKostro
., Cal: Court of Appeals, 2nd Appellate Dist., Div. 4 2010, B209780, January 28, 2010: Whether characterized as an arbitration, a mediation, or as some other form of alternative dispute resolution, if the undisputed facts demonstrate that an ADR Professional recused himself or withdrew from providing a binding resolution based on a doubt whether he or she could be fair and impartial, that act would be integral to the ADR Professional’s quasi-judicial function and would therefore be… [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Religious citizens have appealed to notions of religious rights grounded in law in an effort to bypass or restrict state scrutiny and regulation of group activity. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by PaulKostro
MITCHELL, No. 09-2144, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, March 17, 2010: In 2008, the District Attorney of Wyoming County in Pennsylvania presented teens suspected of “sexting” with a choice: either attend an education program designed by the District Attorney in conjunction with two other agencies or face felony child pornography charges. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by PaulKostro
In other words, “[a] party who consents to, acquiesces in, or encourages an error cannot use that error as the basis for an objection on appeal. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm by PaulKostro
On appeal, the court reversed the conviction because the court “concluded that although testimony in respect of [BWS] satisfied the requirements of New Jersey Rule of Evidence 703, the testimony that battered women not diagnosed with [BWS] exhibit characteristics similar to women with the syndrome did not. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:41 pm by PaulKostro
(stating that “speculation does not meet the evidential requirements which would . . . defeat a summary judgment motion”), certif. granted, 183 N.J. 592 (2005), appeal dismissed Jan. 3, 2006; Martin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:05 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1977)(biological mother’s unopposed appeal was remanded for a hearing on whether visitation would be in the fifteen-year-old child’s best interests). [read post]