Search for: "Sorrells v. United States" Results 121 - 135 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the case the United States filed an amicus brief noting all of that and arguing in favor of Ms. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s expressive at least in part.Dinwoodie: compare to European concept of advertising function, whatever that is, versus source identifying function.Linford: Sorrell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
Second, Purdy attributes the Court’s controversial Citizens United and Sorrell opinions to a version of economic libertarianism holding that (1) “the distinction between politics and markets, or principles and interests, is spurious”; (2) there is no publicly accepted measure of value except willingness to pay; and (3) therefore, “elections and other institutions should come to resemble markets as much as possible. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm by Caleb Trotter
” Even if the government’s stated interests were sufficient to satisfy scrutiny under Central Hudson, Kennedy’s concurring opinion stated that he would apply Sorrell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]