Search for: "South v. South" Results 121 - 140 of 17,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Jack Pringle
The statutory elective share previously was limited to the “probate estate” pursuant to South Carolina Code §62-2-201 and §62-2-202, but was expanded by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Seifert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:31 pm by Matthew Kolken
The Miami Herald reports that suspended head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for South Florida, Anthony V. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
  The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
  The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
Third, in the spirit of Brown v Board of Education and the Treatment Action Campaign litigation in South Africa on behalf of those denied available treatment for HIV/AIDS, the ICJ case involved an effort on the international level to secure judicial protection for vulnerable persons when other avenues for redress were blocked. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by David Wilson
With the recent decision in Winrose Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by David Wilson
  The usual answer is “it depends,” and the South Carolina Court of Appeals made it clear in Community Services Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust House of Lords “The right to life protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights imposed an operational obligation on medical authorities to do all that could reasonably be expected of them to prevent a patient detained in a mental hospital who was known to be [...] [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Deference had entered South African administrative law four years earlier via a highly influential journal article by leading South African administrative-law scholar, Cora Hoexter. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:38 am by Buckingham
This is a follow-up to our recent post regarding the pending Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:39 am by A. Randolph Hough
Supreme Court has ruled that for DUI checkpoints to be constitutionally valid, certain rules must be followed: in Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]