Search for: "Spitzer v. Spitzer" Results 121 - 140 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
-appellants-cross-appellees NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness LawDance Group, Officer Denied Summary Judgment in Case for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Self-Dealing Spitzer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:32 am
  Perhaps we should combine this Fox show with the presidential debates and cut right through political spin to get at the truth behind the "boxers v. briefs" questions. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:33 am by Walter Olson
The immediate news event that prompted the coverage, summarized by Eugene Volokh: a Seventh Circuit decision, in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
[Point of Law; Rossmiller; Woullard v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:19 am by Larry
The judges upheld a lower court's denial of a request by Budd Larner in Short Hills to pay its $159,100 lien out of its client's interest in the home, which was the couple's principal asset in Pernini v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 2:45 am
A Supreme Court ruling in the D.C. gun- ban case 'could do for gun-control advocates what Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“However, pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, the time within which to sue on the claim is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:20 am
The People of the State of New York, by Elliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Petitioner-Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that order to state a cause of action to recover for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, the plaintiff must allege a specific business relationship with an identified third party with which the defendants interfered, citing a number of court decisions including Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Linder, 88 AD2d 50, 72, affd 59 NY2d 314). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that order to state a cause of action to recover for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, the plaintiff must allege a specific business relationship with an identified third party with which the defendants interfered, citing a number of court decisions including Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Linder, 88 AD2d 50, 72, affd 59 NY2d 314). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:45 pm
I returned to the office today, haven't had time to read the SCOTUS opinions in Cuomo v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:14 am
The insurance industry called an offensive foul/charging, and on August 1, 2007, former Governor Eliot Spitzer pocket vetoed that bill, noting in his veto memorandum:Much of this dispute seems to result from the manner in which this bill was passed. [read post]