Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
(See Eggert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm
California, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014), as Riley is controlling and Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
Perry (holding that the proponents of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend it on appeal). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:13 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 2:00 am
Traditional employment remains alive, well, and stronger than ever after the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 2:00 am
Traditional employment remains alive, well, and stronger than ever after the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
This issue, of course, may come up in some UCL cases pending in federal court as a result of CAFA. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
On Monday, the Northern District of California granted Gap, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment in Ruiz v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
Supreme Court may have no choice but to take up the case. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
Here: Opening Brief North Fork Brief Federal Brief Reply Lower court materials here. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
The Ninth Circuit has now essentially thrown up its hands. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:44 am
The Court is allowing California the opportunity to come up with some alternate means of reducing their inmate population, but the end result must be a reduction in California’s prison population to 137.5% of their maximum capacity of 80,000 inmates. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Schneckloth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:40 am
No one would dispute that the start-up is indebted to its employees. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
In Lee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
Workers who experience similar wage and hour violations can unite to stand up against their employer and demand that they are paid for what they are owed. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
Heads up: Association des Eleveurs de Canards et d’oies du Quebec v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
This holding is inconsistent with long standing principles of California insurance law and appears to improperly enhance the minimal pleading threshold under Ashcroft v. [read post]
