Search for: "Standard v. Hobbs"
Results 121 - 140
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
The Court said so unanimously in Matal v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Hobbs, 10-9647. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
Utah v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
It also follows the suggestion of Lewison LJ that the hard line taken in relation to surveys in “standard” trade mark infringement cases may not apply in the other situations he identified. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
” Tomorrow the Court will hear oral arguments in Holt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Hobbs (10-9647), each involving a youth who was 14 years old at the time of the crimes involved. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Hobbs) and employment context (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:20 am
In HILB Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
The events giving rise to PDR Network v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
Id.; Citron v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
The standards constitute the first major update to school lunch guidelines issued by the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Relying on expert testimony applying that standard, the Ohio state courts rejected respondent Danny Hill’s Atkins claim because he lacked adaptive-skills deficits. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
How much do we want to use rules v. standards? [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
The Mitchell court clarified that “an alleged violation of chapter 718 is itself a harm for which section 718.303 authorizes injunctive relief,” citing Hobbs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
In the case of Hobbs v Warner, 2019 BCSC 2196 Donegan J dismissed a defamation claim under SLAPP legislation. [read post]
