Search for: "State v. Crosby" Results 121 - 140 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 5:32 am by David Zaring
See Vitesse, 771 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, ‘Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it’ ”); see also Crosby v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Vitesse, 771 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, ‘Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it’ ”); see also Crosby v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The closer an employee is to the functioning of state power, the further the due process entitlements of the Convention are from his grasp: see the detailed attention given to this matter by Nicol J in Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (our post here). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
See Nicol J’s fascinating judgment in Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 for a condensed history of this litigation and our comment on it here. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
State of FloridaDocket: 10-1139Issue(s): (1) Whether Florida's prohibition on the use of state or private funds by universities to support academic travel to Cuba and other disfavored nations is consistent with the Court's decision in Crosby v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
State of FloridaDocket: 10-1139Issue(s): (1) Whether Florida's prohibition on the use of state or private funds by universities to support academic travel to Cuba and other disfavored nations is consistent with the Court's decision in Crosby v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am by Rosalind English
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011)… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:57 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Crosby v. [read post]