Search for: "State, in the Interest of Gc"
Results 121 - 140
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 3:14 am
So it’s going to be interesting to see if this tactic spreads to other police departments. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
The Committee relied on its standard 4A-criteria: Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability.[6] Functioning institutions and programs must be available in the state, but also physically and economically accessible for all—without discrimination in law or in fact. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 8:59 pm
This step is critical, so it is in your best interest to hire a process server. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
Larceny, that business enterprise with a knack for (fleeting) success regardless of the state of the economy, was busy last year. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:30 am
”The book is divided into five parts: 1) Enforcement of EU Law and Judicial Organisation of the EU; 2) Enforcement of EU Law against Member States and Private Parties; 3) Protection against Acts of the EU; 4) Procedure before the EU Courts; and, 5) Incidental and Ancillary Procedure Issues. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 11:00 am
Even in this case, Synchronized named the GC, but just was unable to serve the GC. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
IPLAC/CBA (Chicago) panelIntro by Adam Wolek, Taft Law Chris Mohr, GC/VP for IP, Software & Information Indus. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:30 am
Because GC and law firm partners are busy and inundated with pitches, it is difficult for them to separate the wheat from the chaff in legal technology, Mehta said. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:12 am
When the state decided to coerce free blacks back into slavery, why didn't she choose Boyd or King as Masters? [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:12 am
For a EU trade mark to benefit from this enhanced protection, it must have a reputation in a "substantial part of the territory of the EU": a single Member State may suffice, as per C-301/07 Pago [at 29-30]. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
A Basis for Rejecting State LPA Requirements — In many progressive jurisdictions, state and local licensing and procurement laws and procurement contracts often require licensees or successful bidders to enter what are euphemistically called “labor peace” agreements (LPA) as a condition of operating under their state licenses or performing under their state contracts. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
A Basis for Rejecting State LPA Requirements — In many progressive jurisdictions, state and local licensing and procurement laws and procurement contracts often require licensees or successful bidders to enter what are euphemistically called “labor peace” agreements (LPA) as a condition of operating under their state licenses or performing under their state contracts. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
But one of the things that they talked about in the episode, which I thought was interesting from an information angle on it was that it talked about you you can’t really convince people by giving them facts on that it’s wrong. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:51 pm
In many cases, and in view of state-issued reopening guidelines (see e.g., the California State Government website for COVID-19), employers may plan RTW for a portion of their workforce and continued remote work for others. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 2:24 pm
In many cases, and in view of state-issued reopening guidelines (see e.g., the California State Government website for COVID-19), employers may plan RTW for a portion of their workforce and continued remote work for others. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, paras. 160-65, ECHR 2005? [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:42 am
And I’ve gotten some really interesting connections. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:09 pm
In recognition of this tension, the GC issued GC Memo 20-04 entitled Case Summaries Pertaining to the Duty to Bargain in Emergency Situations issued on March 27. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
X and Canon II.3.6 suffice to make the measure constitutional, or even canonical (which at bottom has to be the same thing, because the Constitution limits what GC may enact as Canons)? [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
X and Canon II.3.6 suffice to make the measure constitutional, or even canonical (which at bottom has to be the same thing, because the Constitution limits what GC may enact as Canons)? [read post]
