Search for: "State Farm v. INSURANCE DEPT."
Results 121 - 140
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
It is well established that commercially sold food falls under a strict products liability scheme.11 What varies from state to state, however, is which entities are strictly liable. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
State Farm Ins. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:29 am
Underwriting Assn. (2nd Dept., decided 12/9/2008) Property insurance policies usually contain a suit limitations period shorter than a jurisdiction's statute of limitations for breach of contract. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:56 am
Co. v Constantino, 49 AD3d 736, 737; Matter of State Farm Mut. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Co.) (97 NY2d 491 [2002][a SUM carrier that received timely notice of a claim must show prejudice before disclaiming SUM benefits based on late notice of a legal action]) and Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 8:05 am
Co.) (56 NY2d 264) (Matter of Steck [State Farm Ins. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:21 am
Thus, she was within an exclusion from coverage contained in the homeowner's insurance policy State Farm issued to the named insureds (see Korson v Preferred Mut. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:35 am
Rahmanov (1st Dept., decided 11/18/2008) Rahmanov was injured in an auto accident with a car registered to McKain, driven by McDaniels and insured by State Farm. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:58 pm
State Farm must have thought it had such an argument in this case and brought a subrogation action against what the decision implies was the general contractor of State Farm's insureds. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:02 am
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
State Farm General Ins. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 286 AD2d 679 [2001]), and the follow-up request was in proper form (see Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.6 [b]; Doshi Diagnostic Imaging Servs. v State Farm Ins. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
State Farm denied all coverages based, among other grounds, that Spicehandler's injuries and death were caused by Popadich's intentional criminal conduct and thus were not the result of an "accident" as required by the State Farm policy.On State Farm's motion to renew its summary judgment motion following Popadich's criminal conviction, Nassau Supreme agreed with State Farm, declaring that it was… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals has interpreted 11 NYCRR 65-3.16(a)(12) to allow insurance carriers to withhold reimbursement for no-fault claims from fraudulently licensed medical corporations and to "look beyond the face of licensing documents to identify willful and material failure to abide by state and local law" (State Farm Mut. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 8:59 am
Dept., 61 NY2d 557, 564 [1984]). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
Rienzo(2nd Dept., decided 9/2/2008)In Matter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
