Search for: "State in Interest of TB"
Results 121 - 140
of 826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:39 am
Moreover, state and federal statutes impose significant criminal and civil penalties on persons who misuse DNA information. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
We rely on the Attorney General, the Public Defender, the American Civil Liberties Union, appearing in this matter as amicus curiae, and other interested non-parties to amass and develop a more thorough, statistical record over time relating to motor vehicle stops by the State Police and local authorities. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
January 26, 2012), USMJ R&R overruled: As to whether, under these decisions, Plaintiff states a Fourth Amendment violation for the search of B.H., the Court concludes that the nature of the privacy interest here, the exposure of a 6 year-old girl's labia, is far greater than the students' privacy interests in T.L.O., Safford, Beard and Brannum. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
State in Interest of P.L., 2012 La. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm
Rigsby, 943 F.2d 631, 636 (6th Cir. 1991) (presence of tent, in which no one was apparently residing, did not create a privacy interest in the otherwise nonprivate area surrounding it). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
State in Interest of J.H., 2011 La. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm
Alternatively, jurisdictions that conduct a conflicts-of-law analysis typically weigh the interests of the forum state against those of the sister state and assess which state has the greater interest in the process by which the evidence was obtained. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm
State that Caballes does not apply and that probable cause is required to bring the dog up to the home for a sniff. [read post]
