Search for: "State of Maine v. Ireland" Results 121 - 140 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am by INFORRM
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
Operation Exposure was designed to counteract sectarian violence at boundary parts of the city where each of the two main communities predominate. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse;  Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent A Car Ltd… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
UK users will be covered by Twitter International Company in Dublin, Ireland, and not subject to the same obligations. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
Given the litigious tendencies of the parties, the potential value of the mark and the novelty of the legal point at stake, he predicts that this dispute will be marked by a second visit of WEBSHIPPING to the Court of Justice of the European Union [for reports on the first visit on this weblog click here and here].Like Maine Coons, Irishstamps take some licking ...A first for Ireland, as court orders graduated response. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
He sees the Google Spain judgment as symptomatic of a general direction of travel in the law in which search engines and social networks are failing to persuade the courts that they are neutral intermediaries and/or should evade liability for other reasons, as illustrated in the recent case of CG v  Facebook Ireland Ltd and Joseph McCloskey [2015] NIQB 11 where (albeit not on data protection principles but in misuse of private information and harassment) Facebook was (in… [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Graughran (AP) v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, heard 16 October 2014. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 98, which was applied in Ireland in relation to mobile phone records by People (DPP) v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:08 am by Jeremy
This approach is entirely at odds with current Spanish jurisprudence – in particular the decision in Audiencia Nacional of Quedelibros v SGAE (decision here; discussed here, both in Spanish) which stated that it is against the law to treat these intermediaries as autonomous infringers without taking into account the status of the owner of the website who hosts the material. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am by Inside Privacy
Why is this exercise so difficult when the main objective – better protecting peoples’ data – should be a consensus priority on the EU agenda? [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
Referring to L v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] UKSC 3, [2010] 1 AC 410, Lord Wilson stated: “Building on the comments in these main judgments in the L case the Court of Appeal in the present cases held that, in that a caution takes place in private, the receipt of a caution was part of a person’s private life from the outset. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am by Margaret Wood
  Although it is one of Shakespeare’s history plays, it tells of an earlier history than Richard II and III, the Henrys (IV, V and VI). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm by Eleonora Rosati
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]