Search for: "State v Kohls" Results 121 - 140 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 am
Pickering (argue); Jay Witt (brief)State's waiver of revocation by delayMay 13-Tuesday-a.m.State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
State laws governing resale price maintenance have gained in importance after last year's Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:27 pm
Although state law governs the interpretationof contracts generally, see Thatcher v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 7851 Madison, WI 53707-7851 Phone: (608) 266-9329 Web: http://www.dhfs.state.wi.us State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Wisconsin Council on Developmental Disabilities 600 Williamson Street P.O. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court decision in FEC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
"Congress has used that sentence to enact every kind of legislation under the sun, at least until the Rehnquist Court came along.In US v Lopez, the Court looked at the constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which was authored by my home state senator and favorite Keebler elf, Herb Kohl. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
The majority states that the specification did not define transverse and perpendicular to be coequal in meaning. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
The New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) represents the plaintiffs in the suit, Belovic v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
Under the Lear doctrine, as applied by the Federal Circuit in Studiengesellschaft Kohle, MBH v. [read post]