Search for: "State v. A. C."
Results 121 - 140
of 39,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
C. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: the story of Berman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:02 pm
(consolidated with Carter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
§ 40.1-29(C). [2] Id. [3] Id. [4] Id. [5] See id. [6] See Lamie v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
According to the court, Art. 24(1)(c) UPCA in conjunction with Art. 69 EPC conclusively determines which documents are to be used for interpreting the patent claims determining the protective scope, namely the patent description and the patent drawings. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Connelly v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
., Goddard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
She received a California County Counsels’ Litigation Award for preparing an amicus brief on behalf of the California State Association of Counties in Elisa B. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:11 am
§ 30:2383.10.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
The return to EU values In December 2022, the European Commission referred Hungary to the Court of Justice in the context of an infringement procedure (C-769/22). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
(Young v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
