Search for: "State v. Accord" Results 121 - 140 of 49,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 2:20 am by traceydennis
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2010 UKSC 54; [2010] WLR (D) 322  ”The only right to recover overpaid social security benefits paid according to an award was that conferred by s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which provided an exhaustive scheme for dealing with all overpayments made pursuant to benefit awards and applied only where there had been misrepresentation or non-disclosure. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:03 am
According to the Washington Post, the disturbing case of United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Caitlin Fennessy
As one facet of state security, intelligence activities are typically excepted from international accords on privacy or otherwise. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:22 am by Unreported Opinions
According to the State’s theory, Lee Braboy killed Walton at the behest of his friend, appellant Dionte Dutton. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 4:07 am
6-5-2010 Ohio:Well the latest Ohio Supreme court decision ( State -v- Bodyke ) may have thrown a monkey wrench into Ohio's ability to dodge being docked 10% of their Federal Byrne Grant funding. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am by tracey
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499;  [2012] WLR (D)  121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:29 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (2) [2008] EWHC 2100 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 300 “In performing the necessary balancing exercise in relation to public interest immunity and the exercise of the court's discretion to order disclosure, it was incumbent on the court to have regard to the absence of a relevant consideration in the PII certificate and schedule, namely, in the light of the allegations made by the claimant, the… [read post]